Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+V2\,\s+TT\s+where\s+are\s+we\s+going\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+V2\,\s+TT\s+where\s+are\s+we\s+going\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:53:10 EST; Is this rocket science??? All that needs to be done is for TT to take an OI with 1.371x, and an OII (And/or OI with V2), and compare the way the TX audio (especially SP, and EQ) and the DSP NR, NB, A; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01113.html (9,753 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:25:48 EST; Lee I say all that and raise you one. I haven't found ver 2 to be any more stable than the early versions of 1.3xx. I am getting the raspy distorted audio on receive and the strange loss of receive a; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01116.html (7,083 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:10:37 -0500; No, it is not rocket science. Unfortunately, you and Buck and others have not discovered anything new in terms of communications with Ten Tec. Ten Tec just does not communicate with their users on Or; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01175.html (13,063 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:40:25 -0600; You say they are not listening? Look back and count just how many versions of software have been released with changes and feature enhancement. They got to be getting the info from somewhere. It just; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01184.html (14,823 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:14:08 -0800; "You say they are not listening? Look back and count just how many versions of software have been released with changes and feature enhancement. They got to be getting the info from somewhere. It jus; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01185.html (7,986 bytes)
6. [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:30:29 -0800 (PST); Personally I'm pretty happy with V2. And I was pretty happy with V1. I happen to like the old S meter behavior better than the new. I got over it. I'm not interested being spoken for by a couple user; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01190.html (7,947 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: ron@morell.us; Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:22:13 -0800; Reading the mail on this reflector is interesting and sometimes informative... My experience in communicating with Ten Tec on the ORION II issues I've had that concerned me, were completely resolved; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01233.html (15,887 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:28:39 EST; If I ran my company that way, I would be out of business. If you don't take care of your customers, someone else eventually will. I hope that doesn't happen to TT, the one last American Mfg of Ham Ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01234.html (7,796 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:21:59 -0500; Now Lee.... TT's been around for years....Ham radio products represent a minority of their production (go to their factory and judge for yourself). As to customer relations....Compare it with that fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01249.html (9,289 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:11:12 EST; Joe, All well & good, no problem. Keep in mind this is a $4200 high end contest and waek signal DX radio were are talking about here..... I think all of us that bought it expect it to be just that? Y; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01275.html (8,240 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1): Author: Jack Emerson <w4tje@lexcominc.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:38:42 -0500; You post too much. Peace through Victory. Jack W4TJE _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01279.html (8,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]