Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Transmitters\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Transmitters\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:38:29 +0000 (UTC); This harks back to something Rick touched on: Has anyone gone to the (considerable) trouble to compile what numbers they can about transmitter IMD performance (at least) and possibly phase noise from; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00257.html (8,054 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:42:35 -0800; I posted a link yesterday. k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00258.html (7,836 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Ken N9VV <n9vv@wowway.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:43:24 -0600; *AND* The ARRL has removed the "TOR" (T/R time <=20ms) test for Pactor and Amtor with very little comment. That was an important and essential test data point for us CW operators. I am sorry to see i; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00259.html (8,798 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:48:52 -0800; Check this out: http://www.k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf And lots of great stuff by Jim at: http://www.k9yc.com/publish.htm On 15-12-10 09:38 AM, Kimberly Elmore wrote: This harks back to something Rick touch; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00260.html (8,367 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:00:31 -0500; Jim, 1 st welcome back.... 2nd Regarding th e charts , would the new synths make any difference ???? 3rd ikz retired !!!!! At 12:42 PM 12/10/2015, you wrote: On Thu,12/10/2015 9:38 AM, Kimberly Elmor; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00261.html (9,054 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Lee <lee@wa3fiy.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:05:23 +0000; That "TOR" spec is also important for we traffic operators who use Pactor. Hmmmm....? My present radios including Pegasus, Orion classic, Argonaut VI work very well on Pactor as I move scores of mess; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00263.html (9,151 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:08:43 -0600; Thanks, Jim!! Kim N5OP "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00264.html (9,049 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:30:50 -0800; Thanks. Still in recovery, but doing fine. 2nd Regarding th e charts , would the new synths make any difference ???? Yes, VERY worthwhile, and very easy to do. At least 10 dB improvement in phase noi; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00266.html (9,463 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:48:13 +0100; I strongly concur with the "welcome back Jim." Hope you didn't give the Doc's and nurses too hard of a time! ;-) 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) Jim, 1 st welcome back.... 2nd Regarding th; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00267.html (9,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]