Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+demise\s+of\s+manufacture\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+demise\s+of\s+manufacture\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 28 Jan 1998 13:34:04 -0500; Jim and the TT fans, About 1967 or so incentive licensing took away HF priviledges from many of us. Some got so mad they became inactive in the hobby, and also, the change in licensing did in many a; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00268.html (11,310 bytes)
2. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: jholly@cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 12:56:09 -0800; us. Say what? Maybe REDUCED HF priviledges, but did not take them away. Actually some got INCREASED HF priviledges ... when I was a Tech it was 50MHZ above, but no longer. demand in Lessened demand?; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00270.html (14,028 bytes)
3. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 28 Jan 1998 15:25:24 -0500; Jim, I don't believe the Omni VI+ existed in the time frame from 1965 up to 1970's on I was discussing. :-) Of course it is High End today! All Ten Tecs are high end in their time, but at reasonable; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00271.html (10,143 bytes)
4. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: jholly@cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 13:53:05 -0800; Good point. I am no longer miffed. CB'ers Crowding, lack of spots, got married, had kids, went to Vietnam. Probably a very BIG reason. Recent down turns on amateur radio seemed to happen on down turn; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00272.html (11,676 bytes)
5. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 19:42:56 -0600; --Original Message-- From: rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> To: Jim and Kate Belt <jkbelt@spiritone.com>; tentec list <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 19; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00276.html (10,297 bytes)
6. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: Km5cw@cris.com (KM5CW); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 09:57:59 -0500 (EST); Thank you Jim Belt for your highly accurate history lesson. It brings home the real truth in what has happened in the industry. And (I'm sure I'm not alone in this) thank you Ten Tec for sticking aro; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00277.html (8,570 bytes)
7. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: Km5cw@cris.com (KM5CW); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:04:58 -0500 (EST); Please excuse me Stuart, I inadvertanly replied using Jim's name instead of your's. Joe -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00278.html (8,413 bytes)
8. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: NICK.MARCHITELLI@pafb.af.mil (Marchitelli, Nick #45CS/SCBBH); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:20 -0500; Now if we can just get Ten-Tec to add AM to their rigs we would all be happy! Nick -- From: KM5CW To: marchitn; rohre Cc: Jim and Kate Belt; tentec list Subject: RE: [TenTec] The demise of manufactur; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00279.html (9,684 bytes)
9. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 10:44:39 -0600; I would never go so far as to say anything would make everyone happy. In fact, I would be bothered greatly by it if Ten-Tec incorporated the useless circuitry needed for AM, especially if they did it; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00281.html (9,398 bytes)
10. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: dwright@microagesf.com (David Wright); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 09:24:23 -0800; The FM button can be fun. When 10 meters is open, the repeaters up in the 29.600 area are a blast. The squelch circuit on the Omni VI works quite well, and is quieter than other FM receivers I've use; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00282.html (11,126 bytes)
11. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 29 Jan 1998 11:27:38 -0500; You know, Nick has a great idea for a "new mode" for the Ten Tec radios. How about some really great sounding audio like the delta modulation of the big broadcasters of the 50's AM radio? Stuart K5KV; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00283.html (8,826 bytes)
12. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: Brian Hemmis" <K3USC@worldnet.att.net (Brian Hemmis); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 13:27:04 -0500; like That's one reason I sold my Omni 6+ and bought a Yazoo 1000D (no boos please !) Whenever I wanted to do some quick SWL'ing I had to switch to my Drake R-8A or to yak with some of my AM buddies; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00284.html (9,571 bytes)
13. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: larrygibbs@ibm.net (larrygibbs@ibm.net); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 16:01:53 EST; In my estimation, the AM found on SSB rigs isn't worth the time of day. My old Drake T4X worked pretty well with controlled carrier modulation, but a later Kenwood required critical adjustments. Any; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00285.html (9,709 bytes)
14. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: km4dt@mindspring.com (William A. Childress); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 18:34:42 -0500; The receiver part I agree with, but you can remove the CW as far as I'm concerned. Remove the FM board and send it to me. <GRIN> <Alan> KM4DT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm S; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00288.html (8,962 bytes)
15. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 18:53:50 -0500; What Brian doesn't say is that His ham shack can compete with AES in radios to operate. Brian, your a trouble maker!!<grin> Chris KB3A -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissio; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00289.html (8,805 bytes)
16. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: Brian Hemmis" <K3USC@worldnet.att.net (Brian Hemmis); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 23:03:08 -0500; I just needed a little diversion from all the "Whitehouse" jokes I've been receiving and passing on. Hey, These radios all do the same thing (sorta), all are are way overpriced, blah, blah, blah-and; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00292.html (8,877 bytes)
17. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 22:30:07 -0600; Here's my response, though.... Nick, I don't believe Ten-Tec manufactures a general coverage ham transceiver. If they did, then maybe there would be more reason/need for AM. But, in a ham band only r; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00293.html (9,125 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]