Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Tested\:\s+1\.8\s+filter\s+definitely\s+not\s+engaging\,\s+ideas\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Tested\:\s+1\.8\s+filter\s+definitely\s+not\s+engaging\,\s+ideas\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Tested: 1.8 filter definitely not engaging, ideas? (score: 1): Author: tlogan7@cox.net (tlogan7@cox.net); Date: Fri Feb 28 00:45:50 2003; Hi folks - Regarding my 1.8 filter that does not work, I tried Ron's test, below, with the PBT at 4 o'clock and found no difference. Then I opened the rig and pulled the filter out of the slot while; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg01024.html (10,116 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Tested: 1.8 filter definitely not engaging, ideas? (score: 1): Author: calderman@cox.net (Chester); Date: Fri Feb 28 07:02:26 2003; Tim.... If you have, say, a 500Hz 6.3MHz filter, temporarily put it in the 1.8kc slot and punch the 1.8kc button. If you can tell the 500Hz filter is working, you will know the filter selection circu; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg01025.html (11,367 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Tested: 1.8 filter definitely not engaging, ideas? (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri Feb 28 10:34:15 2003; Tim and the list - This sounds like a simple jumper "mod" I did once to give me sweeter (wider) audio from use of the single 9 MHz IF filter. You might carefully check around the base of the filter f; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg01036.html (8,382 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Tested: 1.8 filter definitely not engaging, ideas? (score: 1): Author: VE1BN@aol.com (VE1BN@aol.com); Date: Fri Feb 28 11:07:16 2003; Tim - Have you checked the underside of the board? Maybe there is a broken trace or bad soldered joint at the filter sockets. Had that problem in my brand new OMNI 6+. Worth taking a look see. 73 - D; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg01037.html (6,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]