Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TenTec\s+CW\s+filters\s+or\s+Inrad\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TenTec\s+CW\s+filters\s+or\s+Inrad\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:02:07 -0500; Hey guys, I got no response to the Omni V question so let me try this one thought at a time. How good are the TenTec CW filters? Are they good or should I go with Inrad? TenTec 250 and 500 hz filters; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00306.html (7,356 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:27:53 -0500; hello Keith I am not up on the technical side about those filters. I have a suggestion that might help you. Google search Inrad and I am sure they will display charts and specs to their filters. You; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00307.html (7,417 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:58:23 -0800; I have both a Paragon II and an Omni 6 plus ver 3...what specifics are you looking for in comparing the two rigs? -- Original Message -- From: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec E; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00310.html (9,318 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:08:30 -0500; Good data Dave, Thanks! What I see is the TT is a bit wider and the skirts aren't as steep but the ultimate rejection is much better than the Inrad. Between the two, I'd go TenTec. Am I missing somet; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00311.html (9,156 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <reidj021@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:23:38 -1000; The Inrad filters have the steeper skirts, but.......the response rises up again a ways out!! The Ten Tec filters do NOT. So, sort of depends upon what you want the filter to accomplish. I had an Om; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00313.html (8,222 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:27:16 -0500; Someone might correct me on this, but I think the INRAD filters have 3-4db more insertion loss. John N1JM The Inrad filters have the steeper skirts, but.......the response rises up again a ways out!!; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00314.html (8,621 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:49:23 -0600; My experience: If one wants a good CW filter by the Tentec filters. If one wants a good expensive filter buy the INRAD. I can't hear or measure the difference in the slope between the Tentec 250 Hz C; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00318.html (8,785 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:57:54 -0600; Regarding the Paragon vs. the Omni 6 let me be a bit more specific as I have both. Both being a model 586 Paragon II and a model 564 Omni VI Plus. If you want a general coverage receiver buy the Para; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00319.html (10,451 bytes)
9. [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Bowker" <dbowker@mail.sjv.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:47:59 -0500; Jim, You have correctly assed and describe the relative performance of the Inrad vs. TT filters. My lab. assessment is attached! The attached µSoft Word file compares the TT #217 (9 MHz/500 Hz/; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00326.html (7,973 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:19:43 -0800; I concur...have both Paragon II and Omni 6 plus, Option 3. both rigs maxed out on TT filters. Paragon sounds a bit better on ssb plus gen coverage reciever...I use mine to keep track of the ssb nets; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00329.html (12,043 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:40:04 -0600; I use an external DSP 9+ to do the job. I find that I can completely switch the DSP hardware out of the audio chain using this system. Thus not having to listen to the signal which passes through the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00330.html (13,405 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad? (score: 1): Author: "David H. Walker" <k0cop@onlymyemail.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:37:20 +0000; Jim Reid wrote: How good are the TenTec CW filters? Are they good or should I go with Inrad? TenTec 250 and 500 hz filters are both 6 pole. I think Inrad's are 8. The Inrad filters have the steeper s; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00332.html (9,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]