Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+receivers\s+vs\.\s+Kenwood\s+\&\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+receivers\s+vs\.\s+Kenwood\s+\&\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec receivers vs. Kenwood & (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 1 Jun 1999 13:23:59 -0500; Just a one off experience, but perhaps typical. I find that my Kenwood 450 with less than 200 hours on it, does not hear things I hear on my Ten Tec Scout and my Ten Tec short wave general coverage r; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00006.html (8,209 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Ten Tec receivers vs. Kenwood & (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 1 Jun 1999 15:24:22 -0500; No it is crystal mixed, and that is why Ten Tec can advertise lower noise floors for the strong adjacent signal to a weak signal reception case. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00008.html (6,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]