Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Omni\s+VII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Omni\s+VII\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "H. M. Motley, Jr," <hmmjr@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:48:39 +0000 (UTC); I've had my Omni VII for 3 years now. I find it to be an excellent radio especially in weak signal DXing and contesting. It is different than most rigs I've used due to the way the DSP and AGC is imp; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00004.html (10,746 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:03:01 -0600; Excellent observations Puck. I run an Option III with the lower center frequency CW roofing filter, and the 221 lower CF 250hz N2 filter and love it...but the NR on it is just not what it can be on a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00005.html (12,349 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "John Molenda" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:19:10 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00009.html (14,582 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]