Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+\"fans\"\s+vs\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+appreciation\s+for\s+engineering\s+reasons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+\"fans\"\s+vs\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+appreciation\s+for\s+engineering\s+reasons\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec "fans" vs Ten Tec appreciation for engineering reasons (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 16:15:53 -0800; Hello All: I understand a lot of the defensive attitude towards Ten Tec, who wants to hear them criticized? However, I also believe that Ten Tec service can handle themselves without the anecdotes us; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00066.html (8,489 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]