Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+firsts\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+firsts\?\?\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: Douglas <sparks06524@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 02:22:25 -0700 (PDT); I'm a supporter of Ten-Tec but am not sure of all of those claimed "firsts". First 100 watt HF Solid state transceiver? I don't think so. For example the Atlas 100 watt 180 and the 210 transceivers p; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00196.html (9,443 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:48:38 +0200; Let's take these one at a time, Doug: ** FIRST 100W TRANSCEIVER: You are confusing the launch date of the Atlas 180 with the 210/215. The 180 may have preceded the Triton by a few months, but it only; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00197.html (12,700 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Lee WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:55:05 -0400; The Ten-Tec Triton was being marketed in late 1973. The Argonaut 505 and 405 100 watt (input) linear were being marketed in early 1973. 73, -Lee WA3FIY On 7 Jul 2012 at 12:48, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wr; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00198.html (14,893 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:09:03 -0400; That was the Triton I. The Triton IV came out in 1976. Ron\ K3MIY -- This mail sent through CSOnline Webmail http://webmail.csonline.net _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00199.html (17,171 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:38:32 -0500; Owning a Triton IV, wasn't the receiver essentially same from Argonaut 509 through all the Tritons? Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00200.html (7,965 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:16:50 -0400; it probably was (kept the cost down) Ron K3MIY -- This mail sent through CSOnline Webmail http://webmail.csonline.net _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00201.html (8,226 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:10:15 +0200; ABSOLUTELY NOT! The receivers in the 505 and 509 were basically identical and very similar to the Triton, but the Triton had switchable crystals for the 10m band, giving coverage in separate 500 Hz s; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00202.html (10,322 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:24:58 +0200; Well I need to correct my own post. (sri) The Triton I was the 510 and had 50w out. The Triton II was the 520 and identical to the 510, except it 100w out. They both also had 4-pole xtal lattice filt; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00203.html (11,048 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "John T. Fleming" <john@w3gqj.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:03:51 -0400; Rick, I had a Triton II. Shortly after I bought it, Ten-Tec offered an 8 pole filter upgrade. I had it done and thought the band was dead when I first got the radio back. Then I realized there were p; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00204.html (9,707 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:23:16 +0200; Hi John, I had a Triton II as well, while living in Oklahoma. I bought it for $80 with blown finals. I had no intention of repairing it. Instead, I simply bypassed the Final PA circuitry and had myse; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00205.html (10,681 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:25:14 -0400; I believe the Argo 515 actually had the Omni A receiver in it and came out after the Omni A. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com _______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00206.html (11,345 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:57:21 +0200; That may be Carl, but when Jack had my 515 worked over for me at the factory, we corresponded a bit and he specifically told me it was the Triton IV RX. This was about 10 years ago or so. That begs t; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00207.html (12,570 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec firsts??? (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:14:23 +0000; FWIW, the Triton had a 2.6khz crystal filter and the Omni A had a 2.4khz filter. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00208.html (14,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]