Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+228\s+vs\s+229\s+Ant\s+Tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+228\s+vs\s+229\s+Ant\s+Tuner\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1): Author: Edward Mccann via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:02:40 -0800; Can anyone enlighten me (and others) as to differences between the later 229 models and 228 models. Presumably some technical improvements were made? Re the installed balun : is it a current or volta; /archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00121.html (7,381 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1): Author: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC); You mean 229 and 238, I am guessing. Latest 2 or 3 Iterations of the 238 used a turns counter for the inductor. Last one (C) has cross needle meter. Ceramic capacitor values changed slightly from the; /archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00122.html (8,094 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Mike Pagel" <k9uw@wi-net.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:45:17 -0600; See http://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php?id=tuners As far as I know, the differences between the 229 and 238 were cosmetic, mostly to match the colors and knobs of rigs being produced at the time. 73,; /archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00123.html (9,748 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1): Author: Winston <jones_winston@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:53:19 -0500; The model 228 was a 200-watt tuner, with SWR meter and sliding coil contact, much smaller. I think you meant to say 238, which is later version of 229, as others have mentioned. I once bought a used; /archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00124.html (10,675 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1): Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:16:19 +0100; These are totally different tuners. The 228 was a 200w T-Network, the 229 a 1kW L-Network. See: http://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php?id=tuners 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) --Original Messa; /archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00125.html (8,382 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:33:51 -0800; Don't know the 228, but I've owned several 229s, a 4229, and several 238s. Those are quite similar, all use a dial cord to indicate position of the rotary inductor. A major improvement was made with; /archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00126.html (8,546 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]