Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TITAN\s+DX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TITAN\s+DX\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: vsantis@javanet.com" <vsantis@javanet.com (Vincent A. Santis); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:36:02 -0400; Hi, Just put up a new shiny Titan-DX. On my Omni VI+ it shows me acceptable swr from 3.85 to 4.0. Not supposed to do this, it only has about 100 khz bandwidth. However, on my som's TS-510DG (same hou; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00331.html (7,772 bytes)
2. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 09:47:30 -0400; It would be interesting to see what the difference is between the two swr meter circuits. I've never felt the swr meters in TenTec's equipment were very accurate when dealing with complex impedances.; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00332.html (8,212 bytes)
3. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:18:26 -0500; Steve, except when it (correctly) reads 1:1, doesn't an SWR meter always have to contend with "complex impedances?" Even if the antenna impedance is purely resistive, if the input Z of the antenna do; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00333.html (8,944 bytes)
4. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 07:47:01 -1000; Best to probably borrow a Bird 43, probably need a couple of slugs, for sure a 50 or 100 watt one to read the reflected power, the other to handle the Titan output. Then you will KNOW what is going; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00335.html (7,710 bytes)
5. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:44:12 -0500; Not necessarily, Bob. SWR bridges of the conventional Bruene design will read 1:1 ONLY when they see a 50-ohm resistive load in the output port. In your 100-ohm example, the meter will read 2:1 not 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00336.html (10,845 bytes)
6. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: tacquire@earthlink.net (Dan); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:01:39 -0700; A basic swr circuit just rectifies some rf and turns it into dc to run through a meter. As far as I know it's got nothing to do with the antenna or swr itself. It's just a basically a power supply th; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00337.html (9,891 bytes)
7. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: tacquire@earthlink.net (Dan); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:04:29 -0700; Ah who needs a good ground, it's just one more hole to drill in the wall! :) To be perfectly honest the only case where I found a ground was needed was on my old tube type gear. Would get an rf bite; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00338.html (12,320 bytes)
8. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 15:35:14 -0500; EVERY ham station needs an effective ground for safety purposes. If your shack is wired to NEC standards and your equipment meets all standards for power wiring, etc. then you have all the safety gro; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00339.html (8,980 bytes)
9. [TenTec] TITAN DX (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (John Crux); Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 00:24:16 +0100; I think you are simply seeing the difference in ground loss between two different locations/ground setups. If you increase your losses enough, you will see an even wider bandwidth ... For maximum ban; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00341.html (8,575 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]