Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+THANK\s+YOU\s+AND\s+APOLOGY\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 03:54:16 -0400
The charts on his website are totally misleadding. That's his take. -- Gentlemen - I may be mistaken, and greatly misunderstand all this, but to accuse me of deception or misrepresentation is a low
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00732.html (13,161 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:53:13 -0700
"THEY HAVE NEARLY THE SAME COMPOSITE NOISE." Several points. Mr. Allison is probably not a contester. He is looking as a lab tech, not as a user. Second, they way the data are plotted with all the da
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00754.html (13,075 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:54:28 -0400
Nice post, JB. As Rick mentioned, I read the ANTENNA BOOK cover to cover, and I read the ARRL Handbook on Radio Communications cover to cover, doing that with the The ARRL Handbook a slice a day. It
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00758.html (9,134 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:26:39 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Yo Jim, I think we all need to give each other a bit more grace? Especially on complex topics such as currently under review. We all makes mistakes, you made one this weekend with your post on the E
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00760.html (16,086 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: "n5bi" <n5bi@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:52:27 -0400
Nice..Bill, you are a gracious person. Thanks for the breath of fresh air. Gary -- Original Message -- From: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com> To: <k9yc@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00761.html (16,335 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:31:24 -0700
On 7/27/2014 12:26 PM, Billy Cox wrote: We all makes mistakes, you made one this weekend with your post on the E brand forum as to saying that someone needed to be fired over a schematic? True? My pr
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00763.html (7,955 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:36:02 -0400
Some of the older handbooks cover topics such as modulation much better. It's always good to keep a few around your reading room. 73 - Eric W9WLW Sent from my iPhone _________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00791.html (10,195 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu