Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TEN\-TEC\s+SSB\s+NETS\s+ON\s+SUNDAY\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "John Occhipinti" <k3ur@att.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:56:05 -0400
The TEN-TEC 40 meter SSB net will meet on Sunday March 17th at 19:00 UTC on or about 7.261 LSB. Yes, the 40 meter net is moving up 1 kHz in order to avoid any interference with the SouthCars Net, whi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00211.html (9,058 bytes)

2. [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: Andy Flessner <k9arm1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:39:09 -0500
Actually, 7258 is Midcars, Southcars is on 7251 and Ecars is on 7255. Midcars normally concludes its service at 1800 UTC, so you wouldn't interfere with them. www.midcars.net The 68 group on 7268 run
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00219.html (7,940 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:54:48 -0500
While I have high regard for net operations, on more than one instance I have spent several minutes monitoring a specific frequency. And I have always asked "is the frequency in use?" before calling
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00221.html (11,677 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 06:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
To sum my thoughts up in one word "amen" I couldn't have said it better myself. Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00222.html (7,324 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:56:38 -0500
*Having called the Tennessee Section ARRL Phone Net at 3980Khz for about 3 years and Not Missing as Net Control for over a year and a half on Wednesday Nights. I could tell some interesting stories.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00223.html (10,406 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:33:06 -0500
Wade, You gotta give these folks some slack - they may not be able to move because they have special XTAL control rigs just for the net frequency HI HI!! (Or maybe their tuning knob is stuck???) 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00224.html (9,061 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
I took an eight year hiatus from HF operating.  When I started back this year after Santa brought me an Eagle... I noticed a lot of QSO's are right on a particular frequency ending with lots of zeros
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00227.html (8,591 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:07:03 -0500
Over the years I enjoyed operating my Collins S Line. Although sounding quite good and quite stable frequency wise, the dial markings were every 1 kHz. Anything in between is a pure guess. Your Drake
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00230.html (11,029 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "J. Dalton Mccrary" <w4wuq@att.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
AMEN to that Bob.   Dalton J. Dalton McCrary, W4WUQ w4wuq@arrl.net We need to improve our "tuning skills" by using our ears and quit tuning by the numbers. ___________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00232.html (8,848 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:36:58 -0500
I will endeavor to be on the 40M net Sunday afternoon. And I'll be glad to assist with technical or operational questions relating to the Omni VII, Eagle, Argonaut VI and some of the older models. Do
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00235.html (13,258 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Art Roberts - W5AER" <w5aer@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 02:42:11 +0000
Very well said Bob. To me, the "numbers" are just to get me in the neighborhood. I am still in awe of my Omni VII, and the accuracy it provides. I started in 1960, with bare-bones equipment.. 73, --
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00236.html (12,142 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: mary Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:54:48 -0400
Conditions may be a bit rough on the East coast because of the Va. QSO Party. Bill KC4ATU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00237.html (13,521 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:10:10 +0100
Bob, are you sure they were referring to your radio? ;-) ... and then comment that I'm off frequency. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00238.html (8,593 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 03:01:53 -1100
Oh yes as I was in a QSO with one station. It was his opinion that the "frequencies" to be used are always those that end with x.xxx.000. The fellow couldn't understand why I was operating on 7.263.2
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00240.html (10,805 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:13:50 +0000 (UTC)
Amen Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- Oh yes as I was in a QSO with one station.  It was his opinion that the "frequencies" to be used are always those that end with  x.xxx.000.   The fellow couldn't
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00241.html (10,994 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: John Huffman <hjohnc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:24:59 -0400
My experience is that if a ham didn't get started on HF, but got started in 'channelized' communications, CB or 2-Meters, they have a hard time understanding that frequencies on HF are flexible. On t
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00242.html (10,137 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Art Roberts - W5AER" <w5aer@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:49:25 +0000
John, you bring up a point that I had not thought of, thinking in 'channels'. I started out on 40 meters, running with crystals until I lost my 'N'. Then I had the freedom to roam. Now days, we have
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00245.html (11,304 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 05:11:43 -1100
Yes John. That raises the topic of radios that have the SPOT function vs. radios that do not have that function for CW. Also some offer the feature to automatically lock onto the incoming signal thus
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00246.html (13,160 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:36:03 +0100
Bob, it seems people under 40 cannot tune a radio without a bandscope. Must be some sort of genetic deficiency! (hi) 73 Rick, DJ0IP Again as I've said earlier and elsewhere, we need to become more pr
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00247.html (9,039 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: Michael Cheponis <michael.cheponis@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:19:20 -0700
RIT. That's what I do on cw. Even my old Corsair has an RIT knob. Yes, we maybe use a little more bandwidth this way, but if he also uses RIT, then we can be QRV and hear each other at whichever audi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00250.html (10,923 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu