Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Some\s+Orion\s+vs\.\s+RX\-340\s+stuff\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Some\s+Orion\s+vs\.\s+RX\-340\s+stuff\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu Apr 10 17:42:36 2003; The other day, Alan, K2WS wrote, in part: About tuning step size and frequency coverage per tuning knob revolution using an Orion: " kHz/ revolution of VFO knob Step Size (resolution) -- 64 Hz 1 Hz 6; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00259.html (11,540 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK); Date: Thu Apr 10 22:17:52 2003; Hello Jim. How does the Orion's main RX compare to the RX-340? I am very pleased and impressed with the Orion's performance. The RX performance is, without a doubt, the best I have ever experienced!; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00267.html (8,943 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Apr 10 22:56:20 2003; Hi Jim, On RTTY < and possibly other digital modes?>, it is VERY handy to have a FAST tuning rate, and a SLOW tuning rate. I only operate RTTY as to digital stuff, but would imagine the newer modes; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00269.html (9,011 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Apr 11 15:24:33 2003; Well, you are ahead of me; my Orion is somewhere in the 2nd production run. Guessing it will come sometime earlier, not later in May, but of course, not sure. Anyway, I plan to do a good comparison; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00278.html (9,540 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: tongaloa@alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Fri Apr 11 17:27:47 2003; Jim Suggest it's this thing called antipodal convergence. http://www.lwca.org/library/lfprop/adcock/lfprop1.htm mentions under convergence for VLF but IIRC I read something about it for HF as well. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00282.html (8,953 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: tongaloa@alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Fri Apr 11 17:39:00 2003; Jim Forgot to fix my reply address in earlier email... If you've any interest in early solid state stuff. www.edebris.com/~mineral/ The german-english translation of the 1874 Braun article is a first; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00283.html (8,431 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK); Date: Fri Apr 11 18:44:39 2003; Hi Jim, Oh! I thought that you had your Orion. You have something to look forward to. You IS in for a pleasant surprise indeed. Perhaps you could post a message concerning a comparison once you have; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00286.html (8,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]