Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Seriously\s+OT\:\s+High\s+Speed\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Seriously\s+OT\:\s+High\s+Speed\s+CW\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Seriously OT: High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: jhgraves@gis.net; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:21:34 -0500; Given the high level of concern for broadband SSB shown on the list recently, I thought it resonable to make the following proposition. As we all know, the width of a CW signal increases as a functio; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00399.html (7,262 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Seriously OT: High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:24:02 -0500; It would be kind of fun to mess around with 6kc-10kc bandwidth digital modes. Would take up no more space than the HiFi SSB. HF 16 QAM anyone? jhgraves@gis.net wrote: Given the high level of concern; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00408.html (7,930 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] Seriously OT: High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:22:03 +0100; Nice "Icing on the Cake" to the broadband SSB thread. I'm only slightly bad at bandwidth consumption. I'm a middle of the road guy. I only do medium speed. I may peak at 40 to 50 wpm in contests, but; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00415.html (9,174 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Seriously OT: High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jhgraves@ddi-wans.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:34:54 -0500; I am not good at the math but with G.723 you can get voice down to about 5 kbps without a wrapper. So with Quad modulation, what baud rate are we looking at? Does that translate to a baud of 1.25 kbp; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00500.html (9,850 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Seriously OT: High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:55:03 -0500; Missed your reply. Incorrect time applied somewhere enroute. Friend who attends standards meetings for codecs says 2kbps by tokenizing speech components. With 16QAM that's what 500Hz? Competitive wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00543.html (10,385 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Seriously OT: High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jhgraves@gis.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:46:11 -0500; It has been interesting to read the comments here on the list. I am non-technical but hands on network peddler/engineer. I knew that work was under way to get sub 5k vocoders but less that half!!?? W; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00550.html (12,244 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]