Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Sample\-to\-Sample\s+Variations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Sample\-to\-Sample\s+Variations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Sample-to-Sample Variations (score: 1): Author: w3uls@3n.net (John Rippey); Date: Fri Mar 14 09:06:58 2003; "Alas, to my knowledge, no one doing testing looks at more than a sample of one. The ARRL Lab ends up spending about 20-30 test hours on a major rig and it really isn't possible to do complete testin; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00537.html (8,451 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Sample-to-Sample Variations (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri Mar 14 09:26:06 2003; To that end, good points are raised. In my case, I've "hand picked" several components that are used in my Omni VI series. The result is I find a noticeable improvement of receiver performance . Now; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00538.html (10,778 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Sample-to-Sample Variations (score: 1): Author: mtracy@arrl.org (Tracy, Michael, KC1SX); Date: Mon Mar 17 11:03:15 2003; "To underscore Ed's point, I just came across the January '92 QST review of the Ten-Tec Argonaut II/Delta II transceivers. The ARRL lab found IP3 of the Argonaut to be -11 dbM while the Delta II IP3; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00690.html (8,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]