Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\s+1000\s+vs\s+Orion\s+vs\s+SDR\-X\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\s+1000\s+vs\s+Orion\s+vs\s+SDR\-X\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:57:24 +0000; <<<Unfortunately, many of the old die hard amateurs do not like to see such a rapidly evolving technology environment. It scares them.>>> No, from what I can tell, they just don't like having their g; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00481.html (7,963 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:36:34 -0700; Why is it these discussions always manage to come down to some smart remark about young (and bright, smart, and eager, and not afraid) versus old (stodgy, stupid, fearful, and still waiting for Elvi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00483.html (8,538 bytes)
3. [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:10:38 +0000; <<<Why is it these discussions always manage to come down to some smart remark about young (and bright, smart, and eager, and not afraid) versus old (stodgy, stupid, fearful, and still waiting for El; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00484.html (8,155 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "RM" <royalct@inr.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:53:15 -0400; Goodness, I really hope the bands pick up soon; tired of the reflector's Chit-Chat (BS). Ron/NU1U <<<Why is it these discussions always manage to come down to some smart remark about young (and brigh; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00485.html (8,416 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:05:46 -0500; 6 has been open for more than 24 hours. 2m has had some bright spots working New England from Iowa yesterday, only Ohio today. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00486.html (8,176 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "RM" <kamar@inr.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:19:54 -0400; Hi Jerry, Yes indeed; Six is open and has for bunch of weeks; and I sitting here with 3 HF rigs plus HF power. My buddies up here in Southern New Hampshire are needling me to get on the 'real' Six Me; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00488.html (8,580 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:39:34 -0400; Yes - and this would help to add clarity to the discussion, since many people still seem not to know that the card is in fact being used as part of a DSP processing system in this arrangement. ______; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00490.html (8,702 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:05:54 EDT; Why is it these discussions always manage to come down to some smart remark about young (and bright, smart, and eager, and not afraid) versus old (stodgy, stupid, fearful, and still waiting for Elvis; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00493.html (9,893 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] SDR 1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:32:35 -0700; Actually, for the last few days (based on a quick survey of message subject lines) it's been quite more off on a tangent regarding Flex, the SDR-X, and how T-T will surely be out of business soon ;-; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00496.html (8,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]