Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\-1000\s+Product\s+Test\s+available\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\-1000\s+Product\s+Test\s+available\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SDR-1000 Product Test available (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:20:38 -0500; http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0504.pdf Nothing to get very excited about yet. It has the worst BDR performance I've seen from any rig in a long time (only 93 dB at 5 kHz) although I; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00685.html (6,932 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 Product Test available (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:10:45 -0800 (PST); What I think you are seeing is the dynamic range limitation of 16 bit sampling. The fact that the IMD DR3 dynamic range is within a few dB of the theoretical limit for 16 bits I find remarkable. You; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00686.html (9,374 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 Product Test available (score: 1): Author: "Mario" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:31:18 +0100; are the sound card used and not the SDR-1000 hardware itself. TX noise spectra shows a lot of DDS distortions which also affect RX performance. 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00702.html (7,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]