Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\'s\s+and\s+TT\s+$topic\s+altered$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\'s\s+and\s+TT\s+$topic\s+altered$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SDR's and TT (topic altered) (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 08:15:36 -0600; That recovery is not in real time, and I don't know the exact delay (it's small) but you can hear the other station (or others) in the RX while transmitting, between CW elements. So, maybe you hear h; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00114.html (11,870 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] SDR's and TT (topic altered) (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:24:59 +0100; Interesting comments and food for thought, Duane. I once ran an entire CQWW DX CW contest with the Orion on a shelf, almost out of reach and the Remote tuning knob next to the keyboard. Band change w; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00116.html (13,623 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] SDR's and TT (topic altered) (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:37:59 -0500; Rick, I understand your objection to the Maestro based on price but I find it impressive from an engineering and user perspective. Flex isn't after the entry level, no doubt about that. But I think i; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00119.html (16,324 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] SDR's and TT (topic altered) (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:04:08 +0100; Barry, first of all, like you, I no longer use QSK in a contest, but I do run a fairly fast Semi-QSK. Agree, the Maestro is a fine design and eliminates the need for needing a computer. My only beef; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00121.html (18,720 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]