Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+S\-meter\s+reading\s+lower\s+in\s+6k\/2600\s+than\s+2\.5k\/2500\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+S\-meter\s+reading\s+lower\s+in\s+6k\/2600\s+than\s+2\.5k\/2500\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] S-meter reading lower in 6k/2600 than 2.5k/2500 (score: 1): Author: Jay Lyle <jaylyle@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:41:57 -0500; This seems strange to me: 1) Right now, noise level with 6k/2600 is 3-4 s-units 2) If I go down a notch to 2.5k/2500 noise GOES UP to 4-5 Is this observation is consistent across all bands (blankers/; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00190.html (7,216 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] S-meter reading lower in 6k/2600 than 2.5k/2500 (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:03:11 -0500; Since those are digital filters there could be gain compensating factors, that are over compensating, or different styles of filters and the filter coefficients don't match the gain from one bandwidt; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00192.html (9,594 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] S-meter reading lower in 6k/2600 than 2.5k/2500 (score: 1): Author: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:45:03 -0400; I just connected my old external crystal calibrator to my Omni VII to use as a steady signal source. I watched the S meter reading with a 6 khz/ 3000, 2.5 khz/2500, 0.5 khz/500, and 0.3 khz/300 filte; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00194.html (8,961 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]