Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rx340\s+Close\s+in\s+dynamic\s+range\s+modification\s+by\s+N4PY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rx340\s+Close\s+in\s+dynamic\s+range\s+modification\s+by\s+N4PY\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Rx340 Close in dynamic range modification by N4PY (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:05:17 -0000; In a email to the reflector several months ago I reported that the Rx340 close in dynamic range for signals closer than 10 khz to the desired signal was only 40 db. I have done some careful measureme; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00687.html (9,502 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Rx340 Close in dynamic range modification by N4PY (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:25:11 -0400; Well, at least it would be good for SSB now. It makes the RX340 about like the old FT101EE's and unmodified Drake R4C's. 73, Tom W8JI W8JI@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00695.html (7,811 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Rx340 Close in dynamic range modification by N4PY (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:48:22 -0000; There is more to a receiver than just close in dynamic range. The filter shape factor of 1.2 is unmatched. The "field day" factor of being able to use this receiver on the same band with another tran; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00696.html (8,386 bytes)
4. Fw: [TenTec] Rx340 Close in dynamic range modification by N4PY (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:04:22 -0000; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00698.html (8,614 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Rx340 Close in dynamic range modification by N4PY (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:35:54 -0400; Hi Carl, I simply made an observation that your -65dB IM3 measurements place that receiver in the close-spaced IM3 performance range of rigs like the FT101EE and unmodified Drake R4C receivers I hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00706.html (8,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]