Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rev\.\s+3\.033XA\s+and\s+receive\s+noise\s+level\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rev\.\s+3\.033XA\s+and\s+receive\s+noise\s+level\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Rev. 3.033XA and receive noise level question (score: 1): Author: AB5EU <ab5eu@wildblue.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:07:48 -0500; I finally decided to try 3.033XA as it advertised a fix for the rx audio in 3.029. Successfully updated the radio and completed the S-meter calibration. Master reset/memory clear - enabled RX-366. No; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00215.html (7,792 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Rev. 3.033XA and receive noise level question (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:01:02 +0000; I'll take a stab at it - you're not MISSING something with 3.033XA, you're GETTING something. Noise level is proportional to bandwidth and that's what you're now seeing. AGC threshold masked the low; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00238.html (8,988 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Rev. 3.033XA and receive noise level question (score: 1): Author: Trevor Smith <virago@wildblue.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:06:28 -0500; Thanks for your inputs Barry, I spent the last two evenings continuing my quest to understand the issue (or non-issue) 1. Noise v. bandwidth - no argument here - my last 20 years has been happily doi; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00315.html (11,317 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]