Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Resonant\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Resonant\s+antennas\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 12:01:52 -1000; This is not a Ten-Tec specific topic, however..... And, of course, he/she needs to know how to change bands and load the antennas (which ought to be resonant). While there may be some reasons that it; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00095.html (8,623 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:14:51 -0400; Ken, What you say is true, and you can point out some good examples of antennas that are not resonant that work better, and extended double zepp, for example. But you have to qualify what you say. Yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00103.html (10,232 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:42:44 -0500; If the VSWR is below 4:1, RG-59 and RG-8X have very little loss below 28 MHz. IMO, the value of open wire line is HIGHLY over-rated. There's an equation (and a graph of it) in the ARRL Handbook and A; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00106.html (9,595 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:56:56 -0700; MHz. equation (and a mismatch. The circuitry Hi Jim, What you say is true, but take a look at the VSWR of a typical non-resonant antenna and you will see that VSWRs can be significantly higher than 4; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00110.html (12,392 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 07:50:39 -0500; There seems to be, at times, better discussion of antennas on the tentec list than the antenna list. No problem as there are tentec antennas, and most tentec radios are connected to antennas and have; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00116.html (6,761 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:27:26 -0500; On some band either a terminated or non terminated rhombic is non resonant. I guess you could make it resonant, but you will need a tuner for more than one band. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00151.html (7,093 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:38:04 -0500; Why go to all that work Jim, or continually raising and lowering antennas on Field Day? Pick a gain antenna that will tune multiple bands, like an extended Double Zepp, and a good efficient tuner, an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00153.html (9,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]