Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Replace\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Replace\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Replace Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:59:53 -0400; I have a few contester-grade rigs, that are very well respected. But none are as convenient, slick, and ...as enjoyable to operate QSK CW as my Omni VI+ Getting long in the tooth, I suppose it could; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00279.html (6,937 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Replace Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Gary Huber <GLHuber@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:18:20 -0500; I went with the OMNI-VII AND a FLEX-1500 as a sub-receiver using the N4PY modification for a real time panadapter. I use DDUtil to keep them in sync and N1MM+ for control. I've had most of the TT tra; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00280.html (8,010 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Replace Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:26:37 -0500; Noting that I'm somewhat of a Spartan/minimalist mentality as well as being a tightwad, my approach would be "drive it 'til it dies" (i.e. is unrepairable or not cost effective to fix) if you like it; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00281.html (8,842 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Replace Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Gary Huber <GLHuber@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:19:54 -0500; I agree; keep using a radio as long as it meets your needs. For that very reason, I kept the Corsair-II w/ ext VFO and PS all bought new as part of my station, even when I bought the Paragon for MARS; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-04/msg00283.html (10,336 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Replace Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Edward Feustel <efeustel@hughes.net>; Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 09:01:33 -0400; Dave, An Orion 1 or 2 would meet your needs without menus of infinite depth. Most menus are of depth 1 being selected by a well labeled button. The amateur band only second receiver is occasionally a; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00002.html (8,078 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Replace Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 13:10:50 +0000; I love the Orion 565 but I think it is debatable whether an Orion 565 would necessarily deliver more long term reliability than an Omni VI+ 565, which was the concern of the original poster. 73, Barr; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-05/msg00003.html (8,585 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]