Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Regarding\s+conversations\s+with\s+TT\s+engineer\(s\)\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: lee berman <w1idz@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
In my 34-year career I've been an engineer and engineering manager at both large and small companies. I applaud the open -door policy that TenTec has tried to maintain for hams, but think it's time t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00298.html (8,207 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Ewing" <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:16:32 -0400
There is wisdom here. On the other hand, the "open" culture is not something to jettison lightly. It's a big competitive advantage compared with the off-shore vendors, especially for maintenance. Peo
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00300.html (8,910 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:30:39 -0400
Not to speak of other potential problems. TT is a privately held company, so it would not be affected, but if a company has publicly traded securities (stock or bonds), information about potential ne
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00303.html (9,750 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:45:00 -0400
Silencing TT engineers with a "gag order" is not really the answer to the problem. The answer to the problem is greater efficiency at TT. My friend was told (by a salesman, not an engineer) that the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00313.html (9,880 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Perkins <w5vpu@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Good for you. I don't understand (perhaps I am too old to "get it") why a customer of a company believes he has the inalienable right to demand the company do precisely what he says he wants when he
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00325.html (10,339 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Robert Close <rclose@nhwisp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:27:59 -0400
Oh, the distress! Oh, the pain! My $2500 investment provided me with a box that is only a giant tiny bit better than the $10k boxes that are available....and then there is this wierd box with no knob
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00326.html (8,810 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "John K Gotwals" <john@gotwals.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:12:09 -0400
Yes, there must be something wrong with me too. I bought my new Orion in August of 2005 and enjoy using it every day. But after reading some the postings, I have concluded I must make an appointment
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00337.html (9,943 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:22:17 -0400
Alas and woes me, I have discovered that RF is RF ................. oh, why, was, this, revealed, to, me :-( Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00338.html (11,130 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:38:02 +0000
I guess that for some of us, Amateur Radio is just a hobby to be enjoyed. It's an escape from the pressures and rigors of life. For others, it's not Imagine how sad I am that my Omni VI+ and opt 3's
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00339.html (11,028 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
I bought an Orion right after it came out. I traded with Ten-Tec for an Orion II when it came out. Installed all software upgrades with no problem. Do I understand completely everything about the rig
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00340.html (9,148 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark" <w9op@athenet.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:44:12 -0500
Hi Scott. This sounds exactly like something I would have writter. Mark, W9OP -- Original Message -- From: "Scott Harwood" <scotthsr@earthlink.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00341.html (9,991 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Mr Mike <kf8zn@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
I have an Omni VI and a Pegasus that I have Loaned to Trusted "NEW EXTRAS" so they may turn away from the Dark Side and experience the Sweetness and Light that is  Ten Tec.   Success rate thus far 3
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00342.html (9,059 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:06:54 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Thanks, Mark. 73 Scott --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00343.html (11,031 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Derwin Goliver" <dgoliver001@woh.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:15:15 -0400
WAY TOO GO...... I only have a Pegasus..... BUT I found out when I have a OMIN D. THAT ten tec had to be good becouse my omni . SMOKED the newer rigs I bought after it. (RX and TX wise. They had the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00346.html (9,799 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: Carl R Gansen <wb0cff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:45:10 -0500
I remember the furor of IC-706 buyers when the IC-706MK II came out. It was repeated when the IC-706MK II G came out. A similar thing happened each time they spun out a new IC-756/Pro/Pro II/Pro III.
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00407.html (8,047 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:04:51 -0600
Wasn't that done under previous ownership? "They provided upgrade paths from the Omni 6 to the 6+. They had no obligation to do that." _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00408.html (9,538 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:21:19 -0400
"Previous ownership" ??? Where'd THAT come from? Wasn't that done under previous ownership? "They provided upgrade paths from the Omni 6 to the 6+. They had no obligation to do that." On Mon, Aug 25,
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00415.html (10,504 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu