Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Redundant\s+knowledge\s+versus\s+wasted\s+bandwidth\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Redundant\s+knowledge\s+versus\s+wasted\s+bandwidth\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Redundant knowledge versus wasted bandwidth (score: 1): Author: k0avw@juno.com (Eric N Boe); Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 06:01:47 +0000; Given the latest round of "reply direct" rhetoric, I am wondering what the group opinion on reply postings versus direct replies on technical issues is. I, for one, enjoy reading up on the tech issue; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00096.html (7,692 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Redundant knowledge versus wasted bandwidth (score: 1): Author: andrenr@ul.com (RICHARD ANDREN); Date: Mon, 12 Oct 98 9:23:45 CDT; I'd sure like to see the answers to all the questions. It would be silly to answer the same questions over and over because the answers weren't posted. 73/DX de Rick N9THC andrenr@ul.com n9thc@foxval; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00097.html (8,354 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]