Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\s+my\s+earlier\s+inquiry\s+concerning\s+Ten\-Tec\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\s+my\s+earlier\s+inquiry\s+concerning\s+Ten\-Tec\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re my earlier inquiry concerning Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: Jerry Stewart <ne4l@hughes.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:25:33 -0400; A person pointed out to me off-line a raging 'discussion' on a QRZ forum. I am not in the habit of reading opinion forums over there, so was unaware that my question had been answered in no uncertai; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00025.html (7,508 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Re my earlier inquiry concerning Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:42:24 -0400; Raging discussion? Considering that thread was closed by the QRZ moderators several weeks ago, that's interesting. And actually, I read Mike's comments as being directed at the same handful of people; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00026.html (9,723 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]