Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+Ethernet\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+Ethernet\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Why Ethernet? (score: 1): Author: k9iua@yahoo.com (Kevin Anderson); Date: Mon Jun 2 17:56:24 2003; Will we still have RADIOS when you guys are done adding the Ethernet and stuff? I must admit that with radios becoming more like computers, will we still have a functioning Jupiter (or Orion or Argo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00064.html (7,306 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Why Ethernet? (score: 1): Author: ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Mon Jun 2 18:35:36 2003; Worrying about keeping the old, traditional radios going isn't what worries me. Those radios will always be available, and fond owners will restore them and repair them forever. What worries me is th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00066.html (8,769 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: Why Ethernet? (score: 1): Author: w8kc@comcast.net (Paul Valko); Date: Mon Jun 2 18:55:58 2003; No. They should throw out the radio (welllllll... send it to me), get on EchoLink and just get over it. I make a pretty good living working on things like ethernet and some of that wicky tick compute; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00069.html (7,434 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: Why Ethernet? (score: 1): Author: kd4znc@arrl.net (Jeff Modlin); Date: Mon Jun 2 22:46:40 2003; I do not think the gist of the thread is to go from RF to VoIP on a global scale. Using a PC as a front end to a transceiver is an accepted practice in the hobby. In my opinion, we are taking about a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00098.html (7,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]