Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+VS\s+Johnson\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+VS\s+Johnson\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: TenTec VS Johnson. (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:00:38 -0500; We all know that you can't just stick a balun on the input of a single ended tuner like the 238. The tuner would have to be totally redesigned. Instead of only one roller inductor, you would need two; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00452.html (11,878 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: TenTec VS Johnson. (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:46:42 -0500; Lest I be misunderstood. The Johnson Matchbox is at the top of the heap as far as LOW LOSS goes. Not LOSS. Sorry for the bad wording. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@i; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00454.html (11,013 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: TenTec VS Johnson. (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:51:52 -0500; If I recall correctly, that same QST article indicated that the 300-watt MatchBox was the most efficient and well-balanced of those units tested. The 1KW MatchBox although good, was not as efficient; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00468.html (13,544 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]