Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Confusion\s+about\s+563\s+and\s+564\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Confusion\s+about\s+563\s+and\s+564\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Confusion about 563 and 564 (score: 1): Author: W5VPU@aol.com (W5VPU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:51:49 EDT; I made a statement I want to retract about the "dead horse" syndrome. I agreed that "yes, we've beaten the horse to death." On reflection, I take an additional viewpoint. Those of us who read and rea; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00273.html (7,823 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Confusion about 563 and 564 (score: 1): Author: tmartin198@cox.net (Travis Martin); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:17:03 -0500; I think you got it about right. The nice thing about using the "reply" function to comment on a thread is that, since the subject line stays intact, it gives those to whom it is a "dead horse" the ab; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00275.html (7,890 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]