- 1. Re: [TenTec] Re: Clicky Updates (score: 1)
- Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:27:27 -0500
- The QSK started out fast but clicky. There were complaints about the clicks. New firmware slowed the QSK down so there were no clicks. Then there were complaints about slow QSK so new firmware speede
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00208.html (9,926 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TenTec] Re: Clicky Updates (score: 1)
- Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:40:11 -0700
- Dear Clickless, With all due respect, isn't that the same Omni that suffered from "microchirp" a couple of years ago? Isn't that the same Omni that was 20 Hz off frequency? Isn't that the same Omni t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00212.html (7,618 bytes)
- 3. RE: [TenTec] Re: Clicky Updates (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:52:12 -0800
- Is that "clickless nights in KY?" The QSK started out fast but clicky. There were complaints about the clicks. New firmware slowed the QSK down so there were no clicks. Then there were complaints abo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00213.html (10,533 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TenTec] Re: Clicky Updates (score: 1)
- Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:58:14 -0500
- Dear chirp detector: No this is not the same Omni as any of that stuff. Mine has been customized by W9AC and is virtually flawless. No I am not any more forgiving than I was a couple of years ago. BT
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00215.html (8,913 bytes)
- 5. RE: [TenTec] Re: Clicky Updates (score: 1)
- Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:00:33 -0500
- Well at least this list has progress from being a cult to just a mere click. Or is it clique? Whatever.... _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com ht
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00216.html (11,733 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu