Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+516\s+Price\s+in\s+Perspective\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+516\s+Price\s+in\s+Perspective\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:48:31 -0400; A nice analysis, but it is not totally accurate. The government's inflation calculator does not take into account the growth in manufacturing productivity over the same period. For example, the price; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00621.html (11,999 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:37:58 -0500; The consumer and producer price indices are weighted-average samples of marketbaskets of goods which are believed to reflect the spending habits of either a personal consumer or producer. Productivit; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00623.html (15,069 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:49:59 -0500; First you say this : Yet, then you wander hopelessly off into this: And what about labor costs, and other pieces of the "costs of goods" ? There's much to do this that what you suggest ... much more!; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00624.html (11,366 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:03:04 -0400; Art, some good points. Billy, I'm not sure what you are getting at. Productivity has everything to do with keeping prices down when faced with an increase in wages. My point on productivity is that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00628.html (10,949 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: RadioN1IX@aol.com (RadioN1IX@aol.com); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:23:24 EDT; I think that all the analysis is fine but the real question is: How much will the average ham pay for a rig with the features and specs of the 516? Dave N1IX; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00629.html (7,979 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:55:01 -0400; indicate that the price should be even lower than what it is today. I believe the original $595 may have been the right price, but a perceived high demand for their product may have led them to belie; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00630.html (8,953 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:48:57 -0500; Depends upon the competition - what else is available for about the same price with what features? 73/72/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00631.html (8,449 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 15:09:53 -0400; Ten years ago (maybe 12) I suggested to Larry Wirth that Ten-Tec re-introduce the Triton 544 as a mid-line rig. He said that it would cost over $2,500 to build at that time because its construction w; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00632.html (13,371 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: billames@erols.com (Bill Ames); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:20:47 -0400; But, what if TT has purchased sufficient parts to manufacture the rig over its lifetime (5 years?) at a cost of $162.97 plus a manufacturing cost (well, automated board stuffing and testing, this was; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00633.html (13,587 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:15:52 -1000; Well, Ten Tec had to stop selling the Omni+ nearly a year ahead of when the Orion may be shipped. Why? Because they could no longer afford to; the cost was way too high for reasonable profit at all a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00634.html (9,467 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:55:09 -0700; Good point. No real comparison to other QRP rigs? Well, maybe the SGC QRP rig? The DSP filtering may separate the Ten Tec offering from the others. The Elecraft is a kit, over $1K with the good stuff; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00641.html (8,657 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT); Clark, I'm wondering what you didn't like about the 817's receiver? It's no Omni VI, but I've found it quite a capable performer with the Inrad/Collins 300hz filter. The ARRL Expanded Test Report num; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00643.html (8,465 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:08:36 -0700; It is just that the 817, stock, didn't impress me at all while I used it. And comparing the ARRL tests against those for the K2, well, not much of a comparison. Certainly adequate for most operation.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00652.html (8,864 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 22:12:44 -0500; Ah now ... Sure you do ! :-) Yes, exactly what they teach in business school. Now, lets go back to your statements ... Demand ? There's a variable ... Next, how about the price of raw materials ? Ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00665.html (15,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]