Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[jupiter538\]\s+Re\:\s+IF\s+Gain\s+Adjustment\s+\-\s+Reasons\s+to\s+becautious\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[jupiter538\]\s+Re\:\s+IF\s+Gain\s+Adjustment\s+\-\s+Reasons\s+to\s+becautious\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: [jupiter538] Re: IF Gain Adjustment - Reasons to becautious (score: 1): Author: "Dudley Hurry" <jhurry@austin.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:01:44 -0600; Duane, I did perform the mod to my Jupiter, while before it performed just below the ICOM 756ProII as far as sensitivity prior to the change, now it performs better than the ProII and has less strong; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01302.html (14,698 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Re: [jupiter538] Re: IF Gain Adjustment - Reasons to becautious (score: 1): Author: N0KHQ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:08:19 EST; Way to go Dudley. Where the mod really shines is on 75m. I just turn the RF Gain down to about 75% - 78% and the noise disappears, and the received audio is still loud. I'm not sure what's going on i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01304.html (7,106 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]