Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[dx\-list\]\s+CW\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+and\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[dx\-list\]\s+CW\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+and\s+Filters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: [dx-list] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:54:59 -0500; Very well explained Deacon. I hope everyone will read this several times. The topic of key clicks is just as simple and understandable as Deacon has outlined in his post. Tom/W4BQF 40 wpm has a 3 dB; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00034.html (9,123 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: [dx-list] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: david.shrader@attbi.com (Dave Shrader); Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:17:12 -0500; 40 wpm has a 3 dB bandwidth of somewhere between 200 and 300 Hz. So, some 'key clicks' will be noted within a 500 Hz bandwidth due to filter shape factors [bandwidth at -60 dB] in the receiving radio; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00588.html (12,414 bytes)
3. [TenTec] RE: [dx-list] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: otterstad@enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:45:32 +0100; Spent a few hours during the CQ CW DX test. I was particularly interested in finding pairs of close signals: one very strong, other quite weak. Of course I found many such. Here in Europe we are suff; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00589.html (8,498 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]