Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\s+EQ\s+and\s+TX\s+EQ\s+in\s+2055\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\s+EQ\s+and\s+TX\s+EQ\s+in\s+2055\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX EQ and TX EQ in 2055 (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:52:09 -0500; Is anyone else unhappy with the way the RX EQ works now on 2055? I prefered the way this worked on the 1.xxx versions far better. This is another function that is working for the worse in my opinion.; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00078.html (7,040 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RX EQ and TX EQ in 2055 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:02:20 -0600; Well, of course, anything in the code could be considered an "operational trait" :-) According to T-T, they removed an audio AGC function which was the source of increased noise, and that was at lea; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00082.html (8,478 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RX EQ and TX EQ in 2055 (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:10:42 +0000; As far as I can tell, RX EQ is working fine in 2.055 - the one thing I do notice is that the rx audio response curves are a bit tilted at 0dB EQ now. I run RX EQ at +6dB and SUBEQ at -10dB just to fl; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00085.html (7,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]