Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-350\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-350\?\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: ve7asr@telus.net (Rick Williams); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:46:37 -0800; There was a discussion on the TenTec users net today concerning the RX-350 vs the Jupiter. The consensus was that the RX-350 receiver is the same as the Jupiter receiver. It's my understanding that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00100.html (7,285 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:19:03 -0500; Sounds good to me. If you look at all the receive specs for the Jupiter, Pegasus and the RX350, they look the same. The RX350 has a few more features than the RX320, of course. I will be interested t; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00101.html (8,591 bytes)
3. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: Jim FitzSimons" <cherry@getnet.net (Jim FitzSimons); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:31:18 -0700; Rick, the RX-350 is a better receiver than the RX-320. I have the RX-320 and the Pegasus. I also have the schematics for the RX-320, the Pegasus, and RX-330. The RX-340 is also similar, but it is a m; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00102.html (8,366 bytes)
4. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: jtgwin@home.com (John Gwin); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 18:38:21 -0600; But can a person learn to operate that stuff if he/she only has a public school education? -W4SK; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00103.html (6,929 bytes)
5. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: benk8dit@serv.net (Ben Kadish K8DIT); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:07:57 -0800; Hi Rick, Having had the Joop just short of a week now, and having read the info on the rx 320, I conclude that the 320 has no bank of recieve filters like the peg/joop, but a basic list suitable for; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00104.html (7,909 bytes)
6. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: benk8dit@serv.net (Ben Kadish K8DIT); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:39:09 -0800; Hi All, I'm sorry. I was wrong about the bank of filters on the rx320. It does have all filters, the same as the peg/joop. de ben k8dit; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00105.html (6,902 bytes)
7. [TenTec] RX-350?? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 18:26:30 -0800 (PST); I too have both an RX-320 and a Pegasus, I concur with Jim, W7ANF. Without question the Pegasus RX is better than the 320, and I also have no doubt that the 350 shares more in common with the Pegasus; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00106.html (11,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]