Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-320\s+\/\s+RX320D\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-320\s+\/\s+RX320D\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX-320 / RX320D (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Kitterman" <W9CTB-1@peoplepc.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:18:04 -0500; I would like to know the difference between the '320 and the '320D. I'am thinking about interfacing a 320 with my Pegasus and want to know if one is better than the other one or what?? Can't seem to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00337.html (6,661 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RX-320 / RX320D (score: 1): Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:16:11 +0300; I can't answer from experience, but the documentation says that the 320d is a 320 with an extra wide IF out port for a DRM decoder. How this was accomplished I don't know. It may have just been addin; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00338.html (7,525 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RX-320 / RX320D (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:10:49 -0400; The 320D has a jack to bring out the 12 khz IF for DRM decoding to a sound card. That's the only difference. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00339.html (7,740 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] RX-320 / RX320D (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:12:03 -0400; Jerry, The only difference between the two is that the D model brings the 12 kHz IF out to a jack on the back. If you search the web or the archives here. It's a pretty simple mod. That signal is the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00343.html (9,193 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]