Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RKR\s+Designs\s+LLC\s+purchases\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RKR\s+Designs\s+LLC\s+purchases\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] RKR Designs LLC purchases (score: 1): Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:38:05 -0400; It may just a case of wanting the merged company to be governed under only the Business laws of Colorado. Maybe they get a state tax break 'hand-out'. Ben - WB2RHM MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ten-Tec-Omni-; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-04/msg00062.html (8,893 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RKR Designs LLC purchases (score: 1): Author: Jose F Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:59:08 -0400; I hope my pessimism is just that. Agree that even if the transaction is only on the surface, a transfer of assets (of course it depends which ones) there may be valid financial reasons for choosing i; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-04/msg00064.html (9,616 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]