Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RFI\s+question\.\.\.T\-T\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RFI\s+question\.\.\.T\-T\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] RFI question...T-T... (score: 1): Author: "Roy Koeppe" <royanjoy@ncn.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:19:57 -0500; Concerning: "The use of aluminum instead of ferrous material (steel) for chassis, separate compartments, etc. is probably one of the greatest reasons TT rigs are more RFI prone." As I understand it,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00689.html (6,983 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RFI question...T-T... (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:39:01 -0400; That's pretty much right. Steel and other ferrous materials are superior for Magnetic shielding, and if magnetic coupling is the problem, steel can be the answer. Generally magnetic coupling is not t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00698.html (8,475 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]