- 1. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: weingaertner@nac.net (Robert Weingaertner)
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 21:02:22 -0500
- No, the Power Mite did not have QSK, although some had semi-QSK as an option or standard. QSK became standard after the power mites when the Argonauts and Tritons were introduced. I'm not sure about
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00029.html (8,437 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: bigmack@nortexinfo.net (Robert)
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 20:10:18 -0600
- I remember the first time I heard QSK, I was completely blown away... I was sure something was wrong with the rig, and that I was only hearing the sidetone wile still receiving.. Then I heard the res
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00030.html (9,565 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: pcb@connix.com (Pete Brunelli)
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 09:04:52 -0500 (EST)
- Same experience here! Also, TT users are easily identified by their contempt (justified, IMHO) for the QSK performance of almost anything else. I reall like my ic706, but the QSK might as well stand
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00038.html (7,797 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 12:13:31 -0500
- I think if I took an AF oscillator with a key on it and ran the tone into the 'audio in' on the back of my Omni-V and let this tone trip on the VOX in SSB I'd have the equivalent of most other rigs C
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00040.html (8,662 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: w5yr@worldnet.att.net (George T. Baker)
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 11:15:19 -0600
- In all fairness, TenTec isn't the ONLY one to have done QSK "right." My Icom IC-765 does a tremendous job on QSK CW. The only requirement is that the sidetone volume level be adjusted to "fit" with t
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00041.html (8,488 bytes)
- 6. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 13:10:12 -0500 (EST)
- For that matter, Heathkit's HW-16 had even better qsk. This tube type rig used solid state TR switching with no relays. QSK was virtually transparent.Also one of the highest acclaimed QSK machines wa
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00043.html (7,929 bytes)
- 7. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: weingaertner@nac.net (Robert Weingaertner)
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 19:44:18 -0500
- An old timer and excellent traffic handler, N2XJ introduced me to the joys of QSK. He characterized "semi-break-in" as driving down the road with your eyes closed and only opening them every minute o
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00052.html (7,890 bytes)
- 8. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:14:19 -0600
- And the Delta II, Paragon II and the Omni VI -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems:
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00000.html (8,157 bytes)
- 9. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 20:11:08 -0500
- QSK yes but I think the silky-smooth business is a recent marketing term used to describe the TR switching action with the implication that the transistion from transmit to receive and back is free o
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00002.html (8,533 bytes)
- 10. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com)
- Date: 30 Nov 1999 15:35:45 LOC
- Can anyone tell me if Ten*Tecs trademark, silky-smooth QSK has been on every rig that Ten*Tec has ever made (including the first Power-Mite in 1969), or is it a relatively new feature that is only on
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00560.html (7,363 bytes)
- 11. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:48:50 -1000
- Certainly was within the Triton's of the 70's. 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contest
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00561.html (7,364 bytes)
- 12. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: caitlyn@netferrets.net (Caitlyn Martin)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:57:05 -0500
- Hi, every or I've never played with a PowerMite, but one of the guys who helped me get into the hobby had an Argonaut 505, the very first Argonaut, and I made some contacts with it as a Novice. It ha
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00562.html (7,876 bytes)
- 13. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:41:48 -0500
- Certainly was with the Century 21 of the 70s 73, Joe - AA4NN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesti
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00564.html (7,508 bytes)
- 14. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1)
- Author: winjones@ix.netcom.com (winjones@ix.netcom.com)
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:02:25 -0500 (EST)
- It's been on every Ten-Tec rig since the Power-Mites and the old TX-100 novice tube transmitter. You had to throw a switch to go from transmit to receive on the Power-Mites. The PM-3A had a changeove
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00566.html (8,498 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu