Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Picky\,\s+picky\,\s+picky\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Picky\,\s+picky\,\s+picky\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Picky, picky, picky... (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Chandler" <charles_chandler@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:31:42 -0600; OK, so it's a small thing... But, I noticed the sweep shows CW signals exactly centered over the zero hashmark only when the CW signal is tuned exactly to zero hertz. In other words, I can tune the C; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00470.html (7,156 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Picky, picky, picky... (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:27:29 -0700; Were you using UCW or LCW? Using 2.055 I have noticed (and reported to ditsnbits) that if you zero beat a signal it will indeed appear at the zero hashmark when using LCW mode, but not UCW. It's easy; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00475.html (8,996 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]