Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Perspective\s+on\s+RX\-340\,\s+Collins\s+R390A\s+and\s+Halli\.\s+SX\-28\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Perspective\s+on\s+RX\-340\,\s+Collins\s+R390A\s+and\s+Halli\.\s+SX\-28\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Perspective on RX-340, Collins R390A and Halli. SX-28 (score: 1): Author: tlogan7@cox.net (tlogan7@cox.net); Date: Thu Jan 23 10:34:23 2003; Hi folks - Can some one give me a non-technical historical perspective on how these three receivers would compare if lined up side by side with ABC testing on the same antenna? The Hallicrafter was e; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00530.html (7,969 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Perspective on RX-340, Collins R390A and Halli. SX-28 (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Thu Jan 23 16:51:37 2003; I had an R390A and currently have an RX340. I can't comment on the SX-28. The R390A did very well in it's day. It was one of the most accurate and stable receivers of its time with excellent mechanic; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00540.html (9,214 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Perspective on RX-340, Collins R390A and Halli. SX-28 (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Thu Jan 23 16:51:55 2003; Tim, I qualify for the historical perspective part since I started in 1945 with a Hallicrafter's S-20R and have used or owned just about everything you mentioned plus a lot more. It would take more t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00541.html (10,251 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]