Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+vs\s+Omni\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+vs\s+Omni\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Pegasus vs Omni (score: 1): Author: n8dv@arrl.net (RadioFred); Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:39:34 -0400; Hi Jason, I too have an Omni D, series c. I purchased the radio nearly new. It has all the filters. I purchased the Pegasus at Dayton and so far am pleased with it. It is no Omni VI or Omni D. I do l; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00174.html (7,246 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Pegasus vs Omni (score: 1): Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons); Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 06:28:18 -0700; I like my Pegasus. As an engineer who designs this kind of stuff I expect the DSP in the Pegasus to have a background "hiss". If Ten Tec used more complex and more expensive DSP circuit then this "hi; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00185.html (8,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]