Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+vs\s+Paragon\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+vs\s+Paragon\s+II\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: tmartin198@cox.net (Travis Martin); Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:53:30 -0500; I've never owned or operated either rig; would someone be kind enough to explain the differences in the two? If there is a website somewhere that details this, I'd sure appreciate a link. I didn't fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00587.html (7,831 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:06:14 -0000; Travis, identical. However, the Paragon II has much more firmware function in it than the paragon I. The PII user operation is much more like the Omni VI than the PI. The PII has almost the same seri; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00588.html (9,032 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: resluder@coserv.net (R. Eric Sluder); Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:13:38 -0500; I own and operate a PI and it has worked just fine for me on all occasions. If you operate CW and SWL then the PI will most likely work in your favor. I get good audio/tone reports on SSB/CW and PSK3; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00589.html (10,794 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: rcook@hiwaay.net (roger); Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:01:08 -0500; The Paragon 1 does use a 9 volt alkaline or nicad battery. I put a nicad in the one I have, about 6 yrs ago. It does have a trickle charger built in. As for the PLL unlock I have had this Paragon for; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00590.html (9,984 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: wb9iog@revealed.net (MIKE SOUHRADA); Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 00:41:48 -0500; Folks What was the generic "cure"? major design or what? Disc = 3.2v MP chip major change? Sounds much different. Somewhere in my files is a battery mod I believe it's on the "unofficial" Ten Tec sit; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00592.html (8,402 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: wb2vuf@qsl.net (Bwana Bob); Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 17:05:16 -0400; Travis: I think that the Paragon II included AM transmit capability (the original Paragon will only receive AM). Also, the P II includes single button band switching with band stacking registers, lik; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00609.html (8,901 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 21:51:43 -0400; The original Paragon used a standard 9v battery to retain memory and tended not to last very long. The P2 used a more modern disc type battery and seldom needed changing. The P1 was known for PLL unl; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00610.html (8,804 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Paragon Vs Paragon II (score: 1): Author: Toneyfam@proaxis.com (Mike Toney); Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:41:27 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_010F_01C018C0.8EDB5460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Being unfamiliar with t; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-09/msg00065.html (10,702 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]