Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Panadapters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Panadapters\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:58:04 -0400; There are as many wishes for what a panadapter should be and how it should be used as there are hams in the market. They fall into a few main classes though (and no, I'm not ranking classes, just ide; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00042.html (11,186 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: rsoifer--- via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 09:26:16 -0400 (EDT); _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00046.html (6,720 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 11:10:14 -0500; *Please, build that Tube Type Rig!..... I can see the Appliance Operators pulling their hair out as I write this message. I had a young fellow on a State Wide Net, recently tell me that my station wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00047.html (14,402 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 19:05:18 +0200; Wade, the problem with your strategy is, you can't get "good" new tubes anymore. The last good source for 572B's ceased producing them a while back and RF-Parts temporarily removed the tube from its; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00055.html (15,811 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:29:11 -0500; That's exactly why I purchased an amp that uses a single 3-500ZG. Within the past 60 days I've had 10 radios across the bench and from different brands/models. Although the frequency display seemed v; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00072.html (17,425 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: Dalton <w4wuq@att.net>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:33:00 -0500; How did we ever get by with those analog dials in the 1960's and 1970's? Dalton - W4WUQ Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00076.html (19,456 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 21:58:13 +0200; We had an expanded ham vocabulary... "calling CQ and tuning" 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) How did we ever get by with those analog dials in the 1960's and 1970's? Dalton - W4WUQ Sent from; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00080.html (20,703 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:59:21 -0500; Well for starters we knew exactly what band we were on. As to frequency.......that was always a best guess. Even my Collins 75S-3B only had a calibration mark every 1 kHz and we though that was marve; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00081.html (19,797 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:00:14 -0500; Yep...it would be terrible to have to use a logging scale to be able to find ones net.... Ha... Cecil Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00082.html (21,242 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:03:13 -0500; That would be called "bandspread" as I remember from my old S-38B. 73 Bob, K4TAX Yep...it would be terrible to have to use a logging scale to be able to find ones net.... Ha... Cecil Sent from my iPa; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00083.html (20,240 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 20:06:38 -0500; *Rick,* * I hear what you are saying about the 572b tubes. Currently we have a good looking set of Taylor 572s for the SB-200 and also a nice pair of Cetrons. The installed tubes are OK. Just wishing; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00096.html (19,022 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]