Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Other\s+TT\s+digital\s+displays\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Other\s+TT\s+digital\s+displays\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Other TT digital displays ? (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:43:11 -0400 (EDT); Somehow I had the evidently wrong impression that the earlier displays like for the Omni C used TTL chips still readily available. Upon review of the schematic for my 544, the MK50398N chip is mentio; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00089.html (8,499 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Other TT digital displays ? (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:56:07 +0100; I designed my board and firmware to be a simple "drop in" replacement for the Corsair II mpu board. It interfaces to a display driver board which is unique to the Corsair II. So no - it can't be used; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00090.html (9,031 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]