Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+versus\s+IC756PROII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+versus\s+IC756PROII\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion versus IC756PROII (score: 1): Author: p.vandam@cordion.com (Paul van Dam); Date: Thu May 8 20:51:32 2003; Own a IC756PROII and am seriously looking at the Orion. Has anybody experience comparing these two in serious conditions (contesting or low band DX-ing (perhaps in EU))? Currently use a Drake R4C wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00217.html (7,013 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Orion versus IC756PROII (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Thu May 8 21:09:05 2003; Paul, There are differing ways to measure those figures, so they are going to rely on ARRL Lab method. How you set up the test may affect those figures. 73, Stuart K5KVH; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00224.html (6,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]