- 1. [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1)
- Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:56:29 +0000
- Okay, I'll weigh in on this one time: Interesting how quickly the Ten Tec apologists can mobilize. A year or two ago, it was, "Never need to buy a new rig; the firmware updates will keep the Orion cu
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00651.html (11,293 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1)
- Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:17:26 -0400
- This is the most sensible post on the 'issue' so far. Tommy - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00654.html (13,089 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:57:06 -0400
- I couldn?t agree more. I received my Orion in early June with autotuner and all additional filters installed. It is a fantastic rig. I deliberately waited to allow Ten-Tec time to address some of the
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00660.html (15,356 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1)
- Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:00:27 -0500
- I wondered how long it would take our local conspiracy theorists to chime in. Gosh, it was almost 24 hours. You're getting slow, guys! 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas ___________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00676.html (7,368 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1)
- Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:27:08 -0500
- As I said here before when someone asked. "Just how many problems are "user related"." I said about 85% with the other 15% being real true software bugs. And another thing, I wonder just how many fau
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00725.html (9,466 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1)
- Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:07:41 -0400
- Well, what you would say is partially wrong! The reason for the initial re-write of the firmware core was detailed in a note from Gary to the beta firmware test group. If you were a member of that us
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00731.html (8,367 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu