Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+and\s+Orion\s+II\s+Digital\s+NR\s+Attack\s+rate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+and\s+Orion\s+II\s+Digital\s+NR\s+Attack\s+rate\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion and Orion II Digital NR Attack rate (score: 1): Author: "Ken Waites" <BARBIEKENW@peoplepc.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:19:40 -0700; Has anyone observed any difference between levels 4 and level 9? Why not just run at 9 all the time when digital NR is desired? After 3-4, they all seem to be the same to me. ________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00195.html (7,291 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion and Orion II Digital NR Attack rate (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:55:28 -0800; My impression is that NR filter adaption at the lower levels is faster than it was in the Orion. Seems to me that a 1-2 setting on the Orion would "stick" for quite a while, meaning that it was less; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00197.html (8,260 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]