Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+VFO\s+vs\s+RX\s+philosophy\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:47:18 -0400
Mark has a great point. Frequency step is clearly a "VFO" property, but it is assigned to the main/sub receiver. You might (or might not) say the same for RIT and XIT. Anything that sets or modifies
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00350.html (10,041 bytes)

2. RE: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:18:52 -0700
All nice thoughts Martin, but I guess if we let our imaginations run, each of us would come up with our own unique panel layout. It begs the question, do we "really" need a legacy front panel? Yuri s
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00351.html (9,714 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:48:17 -0500
Oh no, not this discussion again! Look back in the archives when the Pegasus came out. I do find it interesting that the Pegasus eventually went away to be replaced by the Jupiter, which is the same
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00354.html (11,422 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:06:24 -0400
Kinda funny. Everyone wants what they want...me too! I want ALL of the firmware problems fixed! And for me, there are only three 'major' firmware problems remaining, i.e., Keying Loop (so the Orion c
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00356.html (13,029 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Dudley Hurry <jhurry@austin.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:14:35 -0500
Rick, I guess you have not used Carl's (N4PY) software with the remote pod. With this you can program all 15 buttons to different functions, and with that I can control most of the functions of the J
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00361.html (12,357 bytes)

6. RE: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:03:23 -0700
Duane, you are neglecting one minor but very important detail: time. Things change and change is happening faster and faster. Just one year ago I would have sworn on a stack of Ten-Tecs that I would
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00363.html (8,638 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:20:05 -0500
I didn't neglect that detail. Until I see a "virtual" design that does things faster and more efficiently than knobs and buttons, there is no reason for me to switch. If I have to grab the mouse to m
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00364.html (10,583 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion VFO vs RX philosophy (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:17:35 -0400
Amen!!! Tom - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00369.html (11,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu